Analysis
Compare patterns
Evaluate design patterns side by side across intent, tradeoffs, languages, and integration fit.
Choose patterns
Select up to 3 patterns
Current selection
2 of 3 selected
You can now review the differences across the comparison table below.
Analysis
Pattern comparison
Reviewing 2 patterns.
| Criteria | ||
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Category | structural | behavioral |
| Summary | Convert the interface of a class or module into another interface clients expect. | Pass a request through a sequence of handlers until one handles it or the chain ends. |
| Intent | Allow incompatible interfaces to work together without changing the consuming code. | Pass requests along a chain of handlers until one of them handles the request or the request reaches the end of the chain. |
| Decision factors | ||
| Problem | A client needs to talk to a legacy class or external service whose interface does not match the rest of the codebase. | A request must pass through multiple possible handlers, but the sender should not need to know which handler will process it. |
| Tradeoffs |
|
|
| Practical fit | ||
| Languages |
|
|
| Platforms |
|
|
| Integration notes | Adapters are useful when exposing a stable boundary over a legacy API, vendor SDK, or payload format mismatch. | Chain of Responsibility is useful for validation pipelines, support routing, approval flows, and any system where requests may be processed by different handlers in sequence. |